DEPARTWIENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. GOURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. NR&536-13
30 Jun 14
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition,. the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 6 May
14, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. A
review of you record revealed that you failed to provide the
necessary documentation to authorize advancement to paygrade E-2
prior to entering the Navy. Furthermore, on your DD Form 149 you
‘state that “I went to boot camp as an E-1 and during “A” School I
got documentation of sufficient college credit hours to be an E-.
2", The Board concurred with the advisory opinion that per
COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.87 “Retroactive advancements are not
authorized therefore, eligibility must be determined and all
necessary documents presented before enlistment”. Accordingly,
your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Docket No. NR8536-13
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the,zburden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Pek S fa
: ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure: CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 6 May 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1325 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 15 Apr 14, a copy of which is attached. However, the Board agreed with the advisory opinion that there was no evidence found to indicate that you had completed three years of JROTC as is required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR949 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docker Na WNRONG49-14 naval record, the “an is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09355-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure IN I - I1133 Ser N32/ NOV 26 2007 From: Commander, Navy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00141-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error r injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04999-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum which is attached. #an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2433 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval ,record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08558-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser N32/ of 20 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08005-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Upon further review, as provided in enclosure (1), and review of the member official service record_ was attach to the Selected Reserve Component as an SKSN/E3 and did participate in the February 2007 (Cycle 192) advancement examination and was selected for SK3/E4. Therefore, the member is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04237-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. enclosure (2) and the DD Form 1966 contained in enclosure the applicant was authorized to enlist in paygrade attend members must enlist in eligibility for an enlistment bonus via guaranteed Class school.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06207-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 6207-01 27 November 2001 This is in provisions of title reference to your application for- correction of your naval record pursuant to the IO of the Ilnited States Code, section 1552. wert‘ reviewed in accordance wit panel of the three-mrmher A session, considered your iii_justice to the proceedings your application, applicable opinion furnished by copy of which is...